🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he could survive defeat by Grimsby. Survive a decisive European final versus a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at the executive and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Over System and Ideology

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The New Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, but still finally accountable should it be delivered cold or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then fire them for using too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and then bin them for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.